<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Earth System Visioning &#187; consumption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.icsu-visioning.org/tag/consumption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org</link>
	<description> </description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:57:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How can we effectively modify the dangerous human striving for more and more?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/how-can-we-effectively-modify-the-dangerous-human-striving-for-more-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/how-can-we-effectively-modify-the-dangerous-human-striving-for-more-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kohlmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of the last issues of Science (3 July, p.11), Thomas R. Pickering, in an Editorial mentioned, “ We can begin to think now on a larger scale &#8211; an opportunity not to be wasted.” and pointing to interrelationships “…that the issues of economic growth, development, and poverty be seen as linked with the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/how-can-we-effectively-modify-the-dangerous-human-striving-for-more-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How can we convince the richest 20% of humanity to half their ecological impacts by 2012?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/convince-richest-20-percenthumanity-to-half-their-ecological-impacts-by-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/convince-richest-20-percenthumanity-to-half-their-ecological-impacts-by-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Buitenhuis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The richest 20% degrade their own and everybody else&#8217;s quality of life, so stand to gain from reducing their impact, they are perceived as role models by large parts of the global population, and they started the problems associated with excessive consumption, so should take the lead in implementing available solutions urgently.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/convince-richest-20-percenthumanity-to-half-their-ecological-impacts-by-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increasing &#8220;use and throw&#8221; products producing lot of waste on the earth such as e-waste, M-waste, p-waste etc. How to control or stop or eradicate such non bio-degradable waste in the future?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/how-to-reduce-use-and-throw-waste/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/how-to-reduce-use-and-throw-waste/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dr.sanjay puranik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the products available in the market such as cell phones, laptops, computers, television picture tubes, electronic components etc.(E-waste); medical &#8220;one time used&#8221; kits and products, (M-waste); plastic bottles, containers, tetra packs, plastic carry bags (P-waste) are non bio-degradable and they cannot be recycled. Further more, there are certain other things such as ceramic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/how-to-reduce-use-and-throw-waste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can products and services be labeled in such a way to allow proper quantification of environmental impact at the consumer, household, and institutional levels?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/07/can-products-services-be-labeled-show-environmental-impacts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/07/can-products-services-be-labeled-show-environmental-impacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fsoares67</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human behavior]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any attempt to link educational efforts, social campaigns, and even the spread of Earth Systems scientific knowledge with behavioral change capable of causing significant positive environmental consequences will require quantification of environmental impact at the individual, household, and institutional levels. However, such quantification is still very complex, coarse, and innacurate. Basic and applied reasearch, as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/07/can-products-services-be-labeled-show-environmental-impacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to measure and evaluate progress in achieving the &#8220;overarching objective&#8221; of sustainable production and consumption?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/measure-and-evaluate-progress-in-achieving-sustainable-production-and-consumption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/measure-and-evaluate-progress-in-achieving-sustainable-production-and-consumption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffreyhbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social-Ecological Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measuring progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the 1992 Earth Summit, world leaders acknowledged that unsustainable production and consumption patterns are the major cause of environmental degradation. These patterns drive climate change, biodiversity loss, and other global crises. In 2002 the World Summit on Sustainable Development identified sustainable production and consumption as one of the &#8220;overarching objectives&#8221; of sustainable development. However, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/measure-and-evaluate-progress-in-achieving-sustainable-production-and-consumption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What modes of reorganisation of politics, economy and society could we envision in order to prevent global environmental catastrophe and the attendant conflicts?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/09/modes-of-reorganisation-of-politics-economy-and-society/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/09/modes-of-reorganisation-of-politics-economy-and-society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Olukoshi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social-Ecological Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic collapse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=2304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the root of the global environmental crisis are systems of organisation of society &#8211; production, consumption and power relations &#8211; which have led us to the increasingly unsustainable state in which we find ourselves. Clearly, it is within our reach to rethink the models of development and social organisation that we have followed to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/09/modes-of-reorganisation-of-politics-economy-and-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to model future scenarios considering anthropocentric activities and suggest solutions which are strategic, targeted, and more fundamental in nature which will have positive outcomes/results for ecosystems, their services and human well-being?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/model-future-scenarios-suggest-solutions-which-will-have-positive-outcomes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/model-future-scenarios-suggest-solutions-which-will-have-positive-outcomes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratap Raval</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human behavior]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human activities threaten the Earth&#8217;s ability to sustain future generations. Increasing population obtains its resources has caused irreversible changes that are degrading the natural processes that support life on Earth. This burgeoning world population drove an unsustainable rush for these natural resources. To decrease stress on earth systems requires changes in consumption patterns, better education, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/model-future-scenarios-suggest-solutions-which-will-have-positive-outcomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How can society transition away from depleting conventional fossil fuel energy without exacerbating climate change by using poorer quality fossil fuels in greater quantities, such as coal or tar sands, and without causing major economic collapse(s) and or massive starvation and famine?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/transition-away-from-depleting-conventional-fossil-fuel-without-exacerbating-climate-change-with-poorer-quality-fossil-fuels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/transition-away-from-depleting-conventional-fossil-fuel-without-exacerbating-climate-change-with-poorer-quality-fossil-fuels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>djmurphy04</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social-Ecological Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate change is of the utmost importance but is, at a fundamental level, a symptom of over-consumption of fossil fuels. We live, to put it simply, in the Age of Oil, and oil is depleting rapidly, and to properly address climate change we need to properly address the cause of the symptom, not the symptom [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/transition-away-from-depleting-conventional-fossil-fuel-without-exacerbating-climate-change-with-poorer-quality-fossil-fuels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the agreed time span (Number of years) over which Climate Change (as distinct from Climate Variability) should be assessed, and what are the agreed major contributors in assessing Climate Change?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/agreed-time-span-number-of-years-over-which-climate-change-should-be-assessed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/agreed-time-span-number-of-years-over-which-climate-change-should-be-assessed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropogenic factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate Change is a topical subject, but there appears no international agreement as to how many years would be valid to assess Climate Change in the Earth&#8217;s system. The Earth is not in a constant position relative to those of other planets, and &#8220;change&#8221; has been a natural aspect of the Earth&#8217;s evolution. 
Since the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/agreed-time-span-number-of-years-over-which-climate-change-should-be-assessed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What share of the growth in global greenhouse gas emissions is due to consumption in rich nations compared to poor nations?</title>
		<link>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/what-share-ghg-growth-from-rich-world-consumption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/what-share-ghg-growth-from-rich-world-consumption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 07:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>glenpeters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icsu-visioning.org/?p=1105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 1990 emissions in Annex B countries (those with emission constraints) have largely stabilized, while emissions in non-Annex B countries (developing countries) have increased substantially (e.g., Figure 2, http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/background.php). Several recent studies indicate that it is likely that a significant share of the growth in non-Annex B emissions is due to consumption in Annex B [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.icsu-visioning.org/2009/08/what-share-ghg-growth-from-rich-world-consumption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

